Comparar Intel Celeron N4000 VS Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Intel Celeron N4000 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.10 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 6 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Lançado em Q4/2017, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 features a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 95 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2008, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Razões a considerar Lugar na classificação geral
(com base em vários pontos de referência)
score
Maior velocidade do relógio turbo
Por volta de 4% melhor velocidade de relógio overclock
2.50 GHz
Desempenho por watt
menos calor gerado pelo processador, W.
95 W
Posições comuns Intel Celeron N4000 CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Razões a considerar Lugar na classificação geral
(com base em vários pontos de referência)
score
Maior velocidade do relógio
Por volta de 56% melhor velocidade do relógio
1.10 GHz
Mais número de núcleos
About 2 Mais núcleos
2
Posições comuns Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Intel Celeron N4000
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
Intel Core2 Duo
2
Intel Core 2 Quad
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
2.50 GHz
4
2.50 GHz
4
Não
Não
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
sem iGPU
Sem turbo
--
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Não
Não
Não
Não
Não
Não
Não
Não
Não
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 e Intel Celeron N4000. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
Não
0
Não
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Celeron N4000 e Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
95 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron N4000 e Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
VT-x, VT-d
SSE3
6.00 MB
Yorkfield
45 nm
AM1
Q1/2008
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Celeron N4000 e Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
