Select processor 1
Select processor 2
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2016
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
Released
Q2/2018
Overall score
star star star star star
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

Comparison of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB It's time to determine which graphics card offers the best performance, what's the difference between them and why?

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and the ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB to help you decide which card is right for your needs. Below we will analyze their specifications, benchmark results and overall performance to help you make the right choice.

Comparing the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC to the ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB in a variety of popular benchmarks reveals key performance differences between the models. Understanding the nuances between these two cards will help you determine the best option for your workload, whether you are a gamer, content creator, or someone who needs raw processing power.

KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC: boasts a maximum frequency of 1.354 GHz+ 5 % GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR5. It was released in Q3/2016.

ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB: It has a maximum clock speed of 1.392 GHz GHz. It comes with 3 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR5. Released in Q1 Q2/2018.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2770 left arrow score
  • More memory

    25% more memory

    4 GB left arrow 3 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2951 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2868 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2796 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    2608 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2705 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2816 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2072 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2961 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 3% better clock speed

    1.392 GHz left arrow 1.354 GHz+ 5 %

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2932 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2937 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2876 place

Specifications

Technical data
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. It includes key information such as the GPU chip architecture, the number of processing units, and other core features that directly impact the overall performance of the cards in various applications, including gaming and professional workloads.

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
  • GPU Chip
    GP107-400-A1 left arrow GP107-301-A1
  • Execution units
    6 left arrow 6
  • Shader
    768 left arrow 768
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 24
  • Texture Units
    48 left arrow 48
Memory Configuration

Here is a comparison of memory configurations KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Memory Size
    4 GB left arrow 3 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    1.752 GHz left arrow 1.752 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    112 GB/s left arrow 84 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 96 bit
Clock Speeds

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. It includes both the base and boost clock speeds, which directly influence the performance of the GPU during intensive tasks. Faster clock speeds typically translate to higher frame rates in games and quicker processing in compute-heavy applications.

  • Base Clock
    1.354 GHz+ 5 % left arrow 1.392 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.468 GHz+ 5 % left arrow 1.518 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

This section examines the thermal design of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. It includes details such as power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during regular operation and overclocking. Efficient thermal management is essential for maintaining stable performance during long gaming sessions or other demanding tasks.

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    1 x 6-Pin left arrow 1 x 6-Pin
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    2 x 80 mm left arrow 1 x 80 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. These include the number and type of ports like HDMI, DisplayPort, and others that are essential for connecting displays and external devices.This information helps determine which card offers more versatile or modern connectivity options.

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow --
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    2 left arrow 1
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

This section compares the support for video codecs on KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

This section compares the physical dimensions of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. It includes the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are important considerations for ensuring compatibility with your PC case, especially in smaller or more compact builds.

  • Length
    245 mm left arrow 192 mm
  • Height
    126 mm left arrow 111 mm
  • Width
    39 mm left arrow 37 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2016 left arrow Q2/2018
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    50IQH8DVN6EK left arrow PH-GTX1050-3G
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC and ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
2.25
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
2.33
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
18 fps (avg)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
15 fps (avg)
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
11 fps (avg)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti EXOC
9 fps (avg)
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

Latest comparisons