Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2008
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Released
Q4/2007
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Compare Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 VS Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 136 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q1/2008, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 features a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 130 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2007, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1719 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 6% better clock speed

    3.20 GHz left arrow 3.00 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1192 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1065 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1122 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1733 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.96 times less performance per watt

    130 W left arrow 136 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1207 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1086 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1149 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop left arrow Desktop
  • Family
    Intel Core2 Duo left arrow Intel Core2 Duo
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9000 left arrow Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9000
  • Predecessor
    No left arrow No
  • Successor
    No left arrow No
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    3.20 GHz left arrow 3.00 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No left arrow No
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR2-800 / DDR3-1066 left arrow DDR2-800 / DDR3-1066
  • Max. Memory
    16 GB left arrow 16 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe
    No data left arrow No data
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    136 W left arrow 130 W
  • TDP up
    No left arrow No
  • TDP (PL2)
    No left arrow No
  • TDP down
    No left arrow No
  • Tjunction max.
    95 °C left arrow 90 °C
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 left arrow MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1
  • L2-Cache
    12.00 MB left arrow 12.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    No left arrow No
  • Architecture
    Yorkfield left arrow Yorkfield
  • Technology
    45 nm left arrow 45 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 775 left arrow LGA 775
  • Release date
    Q1/2008 left arrow Q4/2007

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
451
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
432
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1583
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
1517
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
2628
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2439
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Latest comparisons